AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
I have not compared them with NX Studio’s conversions, but should do that. I’ve been using High Efficiency Raw* files for wildlife shooting on my Z9 since February. i may consider moving to "camera neutral" since i tend to bump colors a bit to kind of even things out.īut all in all, i'd take all this talk with a huge grain of salt. right now i've been using "camera standard" and it's possible the colors are a bit hot (but it's hard to really tell because the "camera" profiles are influenced by the camera settings, which vary), but i don't really see anything objectionable. Personally, i haven't seen any reason to drag another program into my workflow. but it's possible the DEFAULT values may need some tweaking. In the end, i don't think there is anything wrong with the raw conversion. ie, are we talking "adobe standard" vs "camera standard". and it's unclear what profile(s) these _potential_ issues apply to. Likewise, i can imagine how the color mapping might not be perfect, but you can tweak all the colors. my feeling here is that you can get the same end result by you adding good NR to your image. i don't think adobe products are *adding* noise, i think the nx studio is removing noise without telling you. I think the noise issue is widely misunderstood. I think it's super not clear how much that is true and even if it is true exactly what it means.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |